Back to your local site:
 


Related sites

Knight Ridder Washington Bureau: Making sense of Washington and the world.


Knight Ridder election blogs
  • Hot off the Trail
  • Life of the Parties
  • Ozblog
  • Ohioblog
  • Campaign Extra!
  • Infomaniac: WeBlog
  • Free-Fire Zone
  • Debate This!


  • Blogroll
  • Jay Rosen's PressThink
  • Yahoo's Blog Roundup
  • Feedster's Politics Page
  • Technorati Election Watch
  • Romenesko
  • CyberJournalist
  • Lost Remote
  • TV Newser
  • Blogging of the President
  • Tapped
  • Nat. Review's The Corner
  • The Command Post
  • Daily Kos
  • Campaign Desk
  • Scripting News
  • Roger L. Simon
  • Matt Welch
  • KausFiles
  • ABC's The Note
  • Tacitus
  • Power Line
  • Blogs for Bush
  • OxBlog
  • Talk Left
  • Political Wire
  • Glenn Reynolds: Instapundit
  • Jeff Jarvis: Buzzmachine
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Betsy's Page




  • Ohioblog: A Swing State Journal





    Friday, October 08, 2004

    With friends like these, what's a mean ol' Issue to do? 

    If Ohioans are not sufficiently divided by the presidential race, Issue 1 should do the trick. The issue not only would amend Ohio's constitution to forbid same sex unions but it would also prohibit state and local governments from granting legal status to any unmarried couple, gay or straight. Overreaction to granting of gay marriage rights by Massachusetts and civil union rights by Vermont and other states has caused the Ohio Campaign to Protect Marriage to put on the Nov. 2 ballot an amendment so sloppily constructed that even people opposed to gay marriage cannot support it. Polls indicate the majority of Ohioans want such a ban. So how can Issue 1 lose? It can fail because it has lost such people as Republican U.S. Sens. Mike DeWine and George Voinovich who both oppose gay marriage but do not support Issue 1. Neither does Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro. And neither do Akron Mayor Don Plusquellic, the AARP and the League of Women Voters.

    All of these groups and leaders and academics such as Ohio State University President Karen Holbrook believe this sweeping restriction will make Ohio even more unfriendly to young, creative people who can change the course of the state not so much in the bedroom as on main street. Beyond the issue of tolerance is one of economics. Companies don't open shop in states that limit their pool of workers.

    Ohioblog has always thought the only people Ohioans couldn't tolerate were the Pittsburgh Steelers. Nov. 2 will surely put that theory to the test.



    posted by Ohioblog: A Swing State Journal at 11:14 AM



     Latest posts

       •  The irony of Ohio's many economies
       •  Nobel Peace Prize: Trees over terrorism fighting
       •  Seeing Northeast Ohio economics clearly
       •  Say it loud, say it long, say it strong
       •  The Veep scorecard revisited
       •  It's a hairy question
       •  Just the facts
       •  The most memorable line
       •  Cleveland's poor moment
       •  Blackwell goes back to the well


     Archives
       •  July 2004
       •  August 2004
       •  September 2004
       •  October 2004
       •  November 2004


    XML-RSS feed










    About Realcities Network | About Knight Ridder | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement

    Copyright 2004 Knight Ridder. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any
    of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Knight Ridder is expressly prohibited.